English >> Audi V8 Forum Previous   Index   Next   Flat   Threaded

M. Reged: 10/09/2010 Posts: 282 Loc: Costa del Poole Re: Suspension geometry with lower springs/ride height [re: Roy F]       07/09/2015 21:50 Edit   Reply   Hmmm.... I'm not quite sure what that's referring to. At the back, there is scope for quite a lot of adjustment, and especially getting the camber right. At the front there is not a lot of scope for camber adjustment on the V8, as the top mounts are at full outboard position, and still with too much camber when loaded. The bottom location is pretty well not adjustable, without making a completely new track arm, with the bottom ball joint moved inboard. Maybe that is what is referred to, but no such item exists. Maybe I could make some inner track arm mounts with an offset hole? I think I shall revert to standard springs for a while. 85 WR quattro 90 V8 Silver, 91 V8 Black, 93 V8 Lago 93 100e quattro V6. Titan, i think Post Extras

Entire thread Subject Posted by Posted on Suspension geometry with lower springs/ride height Mark Hanman 07/09/2015 15:28 Re: Suspension geometry with lower springs/ride height Roy F   07/09/2015 19:22 Re: Suspension geometry with lower springs/ride height Mark Hanman   07/09/2015 21:50 Re: Suspension geometry with lower springs/ride height Roy F   08/09/2015 21:07 Re: Suspension geometry with lower springs/ride height Mark Hanman   08/09/2015 22:20 Re: Suspension geometry with lower springs/ride height Roy F   09/09/2015 18:46 Re: Suspension geometry with lower springs/ride height Mark Hanman   10/09/2015 09:35 Re: Suspension geometry with lower springs/ride height Roy F   10/09/2015 19:25 Re: Suspension geometry with lower springs/ride height Mark Hanman   10/09/2015 23:19 Re: Suspension geometry with lower springs/ride height Mark Hanman   09/04/2016 14:46 Re: Suspension geometry with lower springs/ride height Mark Hanman   09/04/2016 18:42 Re: Suspension geometry with lower springs/ride height Tim A.   11/04/2016 14:23 Re: Suspension geometry with lower springs/ride height Mark Hanman   11/04/2016 19:02 Re: Suspension geometry with lower springs/ride height Tim A.   11/04/2016 22:38 Re: Suspension geometry with lower springs/ride height Mark Hanman   12/04/2016 11:14 Re: Suspension geometry with lower springs/ride height Tim A.   12/04/2016 18:09 Re: Suspension geometry with lower springs/ride height Mark Hanman   13/04/2016 16:01 Re: Suspension geometry with lower springs/ride height Tim A.   13/04/2016 16:17 Re: Suspension geometry with lower springs/ride height Mark Hanman   13/04/2016 16:31 Re: Suspension geometry with lower springs/ride height Tim A.   10/06/2016 13:39 Re: Suspension geometry with lower springs/ride height Mark Hanman   11/06/2016 04:44 Re: Suspension geometry with lower springs/ride height Tim A.   11/06/2016 12:39 Re: Suspension geometry with lower springs/ride height Tim A.   13/04/2016 17:10

UBB.threads™ 6.1

Generated in 0.034 seconds in which 0.031 seconds were spent on a total of 13 queries. Zlib compression enabled.